AI and the Changing Composition Classroom

November 21, 2023 / Katie Winkler / Leave a comment

Many instructors are fearful about artificial intelligence and what it will do to student writing in freshman composition classes. I understand their concern, especially with the recent announcement about changes in Open AI’s leadership; however, it seems to be clear that AI is here to stay and is quickly changing the school and workplace landscape. Composition instructors, therefore, have a choice. Fight a losing battle or change the way they teach so as to meet the needs of students and their future employers.

If I were still in the classroom, I would seek to use AI in constructive ways. Indeed, AI may prove to be a boon to overloaded, overworked, and overwrought composition teachers, helping them deal with the heavy courseloads they are given. The answer, as indeed in most things, is engagement. Have a curious and playful attitude when using AI in the classroom, discussing the ethical implications along the way.

One assignment I thought might be useful is to introduce a common topic that students in general might find relevant to their lives. Work together as a class to come up with one or two paragraphs produced by Chat GPT. Then, discuss the positive and negative aspects of the paragraphs. Also, teachers might want to pursue a discussion of the ethical considerations of students using AI. When would it be appropriate to use it? When would it be harmful? Why would it be counterproductive to submit a purely AI-written essay in any college classroom?

I asked Chat GPT to come up with a couple of paragraphs on the topic of pros and cons of mandatory classroom attendance for college students. At first Chat GPT just gave me lists of pros and cons, which seems to be its favorite style of writing, so I asked it to write the pros and cons in paragraph form. Here’s what it gave me:

College Classroom Attendance: Striking a Balance

The debate over mandatory attendance in college classrooms revolves around finding a delicate equilibrium between engagement and autonomy. On the positive side, compelling students to attend classes can create an environment conducive to active learning. In-class discussions, real-time feedback from professors, and collaborative projects thrive when students are consistently present. The communal aspect of the classroom, where ideas are shared and debated, contributes to a rich educational experience. Furthermore, mandatory attendance fosters a sense of responsibility and discipline, essential skills that students carry into their professional lives. The structure imposed by attendance policies can guide students in time management and the establishment of a routine, skills that are beneficial beyond the college environment.

However, the cons of mandatory attendance are not to be overlooked. College is a time for individuals to explore their independence and learning styles. For some, this involves engaging with course material independently, through readings, research, and self-directed study. A rigid attendance policy may stifle this autonomy, impeding students from developing the self-discipline needed for lifelong learning. Additionally, external obligations such as work commitments or family responsibilities may clash with a strict attendance policy, putting undue stress on students. In such cases, the emphasis on attendance becomes a hindrance rather than a facilitator of learning. Moreover, there’s a risk that attendance policies incentivize mere compliance rather than genuine intellectual curiosity. Students might attend classes to fulfill a requirement, but the focus on attendance metrics does not guarantee a meaningful engagement with the subject matter. Striking the right balance between encouraging attendance and respecting individual learning styles and circumstances is a nuanced challenge for educators.

I would hope some of the following points would come up in our discussion:

Paragraphs are well-written with few writing errors.
A strong thesis statement begins each paragraph.
The paragraphs are well-organized and uses effective transitions.
The paragraph is logical and makes good arguments for and against mandatory classroom attendance.
One issue is the phrase “there’s.” I teach my students to avoid contractions and the use of the expletive “there is.”
The diction in general is too formal and sounds rather pretentious for a college-level paper. Really need to get rid of “incentivize” in the second paragraph. Yuck!
The paragraphs need to be fleshed out with specific examples and details, preferably from the writer’s own experience, some things that show the pros and cons more clearly and make the paragraphs more interesting to read. With good examples, these two paragraphs could be the basis for an entire essay.
Use this opportunity to talk with students about the importance of developing their own unique voice.

Another great thing to do would be to see if any students disagree with Chat GPT. What do students think about the logic presented in these paragraphs? Encourage students to “argue” with Chat GPT or “defend” it. Maybe have a classroom debate about mandatory classroom attendance. What ideas did the classroom come up with that Chat GPT didn’t include?

Another idea is to help students brainstorm ideas about topics that they are interested in, a process that is not always easy, I found. But asking relevant questions like how to pay for college without going into debt or managing mental health without medication might spark a student’s interest and inspire them to THINK FOR THEMSELVES.

How about even being brave and venturing into controversial topics, like the difference between banning and challenging books in public schools, transgender rights, universal health care, and Black history studies. Yes, I know, it can be scary, and administrators may not thank you, but remember that college is meant for adult learners, many of whom are already wrestling in the real world with all of these topics. Furthermore, using AI may help remove some of the fallacious reasoning some students use when writing about sensitive topics. In fact, try using Chat GPT to start a discussion about fallacies of logic.

The main idea is to get them to realize that all good writing needs their real-life experiences and their own critical thinking to add interest, for the reader, sure, but especially for themselves because writing that the writer doesn’t care about will be dry as toast and not worth anyone’s time. Give students confidence in their own ideas through lively, mediated debate, and then ask them to write, by hand, if possible, right there in front of you.

Photo by William Fortunato on Pexels.com

The old-fashioned way.

Process over Product

August 21, 2023August 22, 2023 / Katie Winkler / 3 Comments

Years ago, when I used to be encouraged to attend conferences, I worked with the head librarian at my college to develop a presentation called “Process, not Plagiarism” that addressed the growing concern English faculty had over the proliferation of plagiarized essays that we were seeing following the advent of the World Wide Web. More and more, students were able to easily copy and paste material from the sources they found on their topics. Plagiarism was rampant.

The thesis of our presentation was that rather than a punitive approach, zero tolerance policies, harsh penalties, and other such punitive measures, faculty might be better served to focus on the research and writing process as opposed to the actual essay itself.

We began our presentation by showing a short film called “Copy Cops,” intended to engage our audience and make our point in a lighthearted, entertaining way. Making the film was an educational experience for our students and was a project that I still remember fondly. Several IT guys helped my friend who headed the drama department and I with the filming and editing. The librarian’s husband, a professional sound technician, also lent a hand. Students from the drama department acted out the script I wrote.

The film opens with our cop pulling up to the college’s main building in a police cruiser, borrowed from the college’s law enforcement training program. He has his blue lights blazing and hop outs declaring that he got a plagiarism call. “Must be research paper time,” he says. Then, we see him sneaking down the dark hallway, crashing through the door. Three students who are typing away, stop and look up. Caught red handed.

Our cop interrogates each perp–the first one was trying to buy a paper off the internet–blatant plagiarism. The cop says, “Don’t you know we have software to pick that up.” The second plagiarist claims “I changed around a few words, so it’s okay.”

“No!” says the cop. He explains that he has committed mosaic plagiarism. The student bows his head in disgrace. The final plagiarist is a sad case, according to the cop. She had, she says, “50 MLA citations at the end” of her paper, but the cop explains that she also must have citations within the essay to show where she used which sources.

“But, I didn’t know,” she cries.

Our compassionate cop feels for her but arrests her anyway, along with the other violators of one of academia’s most serious offenses. As he puts her into the patrol car, he laments, “Ignorance of the law is no excuse.”

Showing the video at the presentation set the perfect tone. Of course, it is ridiculous to consider plagiarism the kind of crime we can or should prosecute. Trying to contain the uncontainable is academic folly. What is needed, I would tell my audience, is preemption.

Then, the librarian and I would go through the methods we used to help preempt. Here are a few we would discuss in our sessions:

Develop research questions. Instructing the students to develop specific research questions helps focus the research and prevents students from writing researched essays that are too generic and easily plagiarized. In the last decade of my teaching, I required students to develop research questions that were specific to our college or one of the communities that the college served. This method worked particularly well in helping reduce plagiarism. Even if I couldn’t prevent the student from plagiarizing, the essay would usually receive a poor grade because it was too vague and general, not within the parameters of the assignment.
Multiple trips to the library accompanied by the instructor and the librarian. The more the instructor can observe the students work, the better. Also, our librarians were always looking for sources to help students once they knew what was needed.
Grade each step of the research process. Of course, I would offer low stakes assignments that gave their averages a boost but took little effort to grade. In exchange for a little extra work, I had continual contact with the students’ essays and could be aware of the progress each student was making.
Require an annotated bibliography. In the last few years, I shortened the length of the research paper and lowered the number of required sources from ten to six; however, three of the six sources had to be found in the college library’s databases, two had to be websites relevant to their specific local topics, like local news and government sources. The MLA citation included the information that would show the students were using the college’s resources. In addition, the annotations had to be more than a summary of the source. Students had to explain how they might use the source in the essay.
Require students to interview at least one local expert. This is a great way to observe the students’ progress as well as help engage students. Over the years, I have observed the wonderful effects interviews have had on students.

For example, once I had a student who was from a poor family and never could afford to go to the famous Biltmore House when he was growing up, but because he was interested in interior design and architecture, he had decided to write about how Christmas was celebrated at the Biltmore House. He wasn’t sure who to interview. I suggested contacting public relations, explaining his assignment, and seeing if someone there would have time for an interview.

“Can I do that?” he said.

“Of course, you can,” I assured him. “The worse they can say is ‘No’.”

The next class period, he came in with a huge smile, saying that he called and scheduled an interview with the head florist. I was so excited for him as we worked in class that day preparing the interview questions. And even more excited when, after the interview, he explained what had happened the day he went to mansion.

He was nervous when he went up to the gate house, he began. He had been told to give his name to the security guard who would tell him what to do. My student did as he was told and after the guard marked his name off the list, he was instructed to drive straight up to the house and park in the employee parking lot, which he did. The head florist greeted him warmly and proceeded to give him a 45-minute interview. Not only did she answer his questions, but she had a folder of materials for him to use on his essay, including photocopies of an article from Southern Living about the Biltmore House at Christmas and a copy of an actual purchase order for the mansion’s Christmas supplies from the time when the Vanderbilts lived there in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

After the interview was over and the florist had given him multiple souvenirs from the gift shop, she asked my student, “Would you like to see the house?” He was ecstatic. It was more than he ever thought possible when he worked up the courage to make the call to the public relations office. After about a half hour tour of viewing and explaining the floral designs and other Christmas decorations at America’s largest privately owned home, the florist explained that she had another appointment, but she wanted him to stay at the house and tour the gardens as long as he liked, that he was her guest. She also told him to please be sure to send her a copy of his essay once he finished and to let her know if he had any more questions.

Over the years, I often told that story to my students, and to audiences of my “Process, not Plagiarism” presentation. They were eager to hear many more “Biltmore” type experiences that helped engage my students in the process of researching their topics. I still believe, even in these days of artificial intelligence and its implications for teaching composition, if students are truly interested in what they are writing about, they will be far less likely to plagiarize. What’s more, many of my students have come away with a life-changing experience because the focus was not on the final essay but on finding something they were really interested in and learning how to write about it well. Writing a researched essay can then become not about the end product but the process–the journey of discovery.

Chatting with ChatGPT

July 7, 2023 / Katie Winkler / 2 Comments

I had a chat with ChatGPT today. It was very interesting and actually quite encouraging. I know that a great many educators are extremely worried about what AI will do to the teaching of composition, and I have my concerns as well, even after my “interview” with Chatty (my pet name for it), but just as I said in a meeting with English faculty and administrators when ChatGPT was breaking in the news earlier this year, I think we should embrace AI and move to change the way we teach and assess research skills and writing.

So, here are some excerpts from my little talk with Chatty: Note: Together the two of us generated 2, 749 words in about 15 minutes. It took me longer to type my questions than it did for ChatGpt to answer in most cases.

Q 1–(truncated) How can English composition instructors combat students cheating with AI?

Photo by Andrea Piacquadio on Pexels.com

A 1–To combat students cheating with AI in English composition classes, instructors can employ several strategies:

1. Clear Academic Integrity Policies: Establish and communicate a comprehensive academic integrity policy that clearly defines what constitutes cheating and the consequences for such behavior. Make sure students are aware of the ethical implications and the importance of original work.

3. Assign Original and Personalized Topics: Design writing assignments that require students to express their own thoughts, opinions, and analysis. Select topics that prompt critical thinking and reflection, making it difficult for AI tools to generate suitable responses. (I have long been a proponent of this technique. It has helped reduce plagiarism in my classroom)

4. Promote Authentic Assessment: Incorporate assessment methods that emphasize originality and creativity. Encourage students to engage in class discussions, presentations, and debates that showcase their unique perspectives. Use open-ended questions and prompts that elicit thoughtful responses. (Ditto on this technique)

5. Frequent Progress Checks: Break down assignments into multiple stages, such as topic selection, thesis statement, outline, rough draft, and final submission. Require students to submit their work at each stage, ensuring progress and monitoring the writing process. (And this one–problem is that even using a checklist or rubric, the grading load can be brutal if the instructor has to teach 16 weeks of material in 8 weeks)

8. Personalized Feedback and Revision: Provide individualized feedback on writing assignments, highlighting areas of improvement and offering suggestions for further development. Emphasize the value of the writing process and the importance of revisions. (Also can be brutal with a heavy teaching load, but I asked Chatty about that. See below)

9. Foster a Supportive Classroom Environment: Encourage open communication and foster a classroom culture that values originality and academic integrity. Engage students in discussions about the ethical implications of cheating and the benefits of personal growth through authentic learning. (Difficult when teaching online. It can be done, but it requires a great deal of work that overloaded instructors often don’t have.)

By implementing these strategies, English composition instructors can actively discourage and prevent students from cheating with AI while promoting the development of essential writing skills and fostering a culture of integrity.

Q2–What if I have over 100 students’ papers to grade? How can English instructors do the things you suggest when they have so much grading to do?

A2–Grading a large number of student papers can be time-consuming and challenging. However, here are some suggestions to manage the grading process effectively while still implementing the strategies mentioned earlier:

1. Set Clear Expectations: Clearly communicate your grading criteria, expectations, and the reasoning behind them to students at the beginning of the course. This will help students understand the parameters within which they should work and reduce the likelihood of cheating.

2. Use Rubrics: Develop a comprehensive rubric that outlines the key components you will assess in students’ papers. This will provide a structured approach to grading and ensure consistency across multiple papers.

3. Prioritize Key Assignments: Consider selecting a few key assignments that require more in-depth analysis and focus your efforts on providing detailed feedback on those. For less critical assignments, you can use more streamlined feedback methods, such as highlighting common errors or providing general comments.

5. Implement Efficient Grading Techniques: Explore strategies to streamline the grading process. For example, you can set a specific time limit for grading each paper to maintain consistency and prevent burnout. Additionally, consider using abbreviations or standardized comments to provide feedback efficiently.

7. Consider Sampling: Instead of grading every paper in its entirety, you can employ sampling techniques. Randomly select a subset of papers to grade comprehensively, while giving the others a lighter evaluation, focusing on key areas or specific aspects you want to assess.

Remember, it’s important to strike a balance between providing valuable feedback and managing your workload efficiently. By implementing these strategies, you can effectively grade a large number of papers while still incorporating the suggested methods to combat cheating with AI.

Q3–How can I incorporate AI into the English composition classroom? Can you give me a sample assignment?

A3–Incorporating AI into the English composition classroom can offer various opportunities for engaging and innovative assignments. Here’s a sample assignment that integrates AI technology:

Assignment: Exploring AI in Writing Analysis

Objective: To critically analyze the impact of AI on writing and language usage.

Instructions:

1. Research: Begin by conducting research on the applications of AI in the field of writing and language analysis. Explore topics such as automated grading systems, AI-powered writing assistants, and language generation algorithms.

2. Case Studies: Select at least two case studies or examples where AI has been utilized in the context of writing analysis. These could include plagiarism detection tools, grammar and style checkers, or content summarization algorithms.

3. Comparative Analysis: Compare and contrast the strengths, limitations, and ethical implications of each AI tool or system you have chosen. Consider factors such as accuracy, bias, privacy concerns, and the impact on creativity and originality in writing.

4. Critical Reflection: Write a reflective essay that addresses the following points:

a. Describe your experience using AI writing tools, if applicable. How did they impact your writing process and outcomes?

b. Evaluate the effectiveness of AI tools in detecting plagiarism, improving grammar, or enhancing writing style. Reflect on their strengths and weaknesses.

c. Discuss the ethical considerations associated with AI use in writing analysis. Explore concerns related to authenticity, privacy, and the potential suppression of unique voices.

5. Recommendations: Based on your analysis and reflection, provide recommendations for students, instructors, and policymakers on how to navigate the use of AI tools effectively and ethically in writing contexts.

6. Class Discussion: Engage in a class discussion where students share their findings, insights, and recommendations. Facilitate a dialogue on the benefits and challenges of integrating AI into the writing process, while considering the broader implications for education and society.

By assigning this project, students can deepen their understanding of AI’s impact on writing, critically evaluate its benefits and limitations, and develop informed perspectives on the responsible use of AI tools. Additionally, class discussions allow students to engage in collaborative learning, exchanging ideas, and exploring diverse viewpoints.

(I love these ideas. I am not going to teach much longer, so I won’t have a chance to try them out in the classroom; I retire on July 28, but I certainly will encourage faculty to use some of these techniques through this blog and in my upcoming book about teaching. I hope to have it finished by the end of the year.)

Q4–I feel that educators are going to end up using computers to grade computer-generated material produced by students. Any suggestions on how to prevent this from happening?

A4–(truncated) If you have concerns about the potential over-reliance on computer grading systems, here are some suggestions to prevent or mitigate the exclusive use of such systems:

1. Emphasize the Value of Human Evaluation: Educators can highlight the importance of human evaluation and the unique insights and perspectives that human graders bring to the assessment process. Promote the understanding that human evaluation encompasses qualities that automated systems cannot fully capture, such as creativity, critical thinking, and context-based analysis.

2. Educate Stakeholders: Engage in conversations with administrators, fellow educators, and policymakers about the limitations of computer grading systems. Share research and evidence that supports the benefits of human grading in assessing complex skills, such as writing, where context, nuance, and originality play crucial roles.

8. Involve Students in the Discussion: Foster open dialogues with students about the value of human evaluation and its impact on their learning experience. Encourage their active participation in the assessment process and seek their feedback on the benefits and limitations of different grading methods.

By actively promoting the importance of human evaluation, engaging in advocacy efforts, and encouraging a balanced approach to assessment, educators can help prevent an overreliance on computer grading systems and ensure that the value of human assessment is recognized and upheld in the educational setting.

Q5 omitted

Q6–Write a paragraph about how a college can improve its online teaching using at least one academic source cited in MLA 9 format

Photo by Christina Morillo on Pexels.com

A6–Improving online teaching in colleges requires a comprehensive approach that considers pedagogical strategies, technological infrastructure, and student engagement. According to Smith (2020), incorporating active learning techniques in virtual classrooms can enhance student participation and deepen understanding. One effective method is the use of breakout rooms, which allows for small group discussions and collaboration. Additionally, integrating multimedia elements, such as videos and interactive simulations, can facilitate content comprehension and engagement (Jones, 2019). To ensure equitable access to online education, institutions should prioritize providing necessary technology and reliable internet access to all students (Johnson et al., 2021). By implementing these strategies and considering the recommendations from academic sources, colleges can enhance the quality of online teaching and create a more interactive and inclusive virtual learning environment.

References:

Jones, A. B. (2019). Enhancing engagement in online courses through multimedia learning materials. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 15(4), 160-177.

Johnson, K. D., Veletsianos, G., Seaman, J., & Henderikx, P. (2021). U.S. Faculty and Administrators’ Experiences and Approaches in the Early Weeks of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Online Learning Journal, 25(2), 6-24.

Smith, J. M. (2020). Active Learning in Online Instruction: Evidence-Based Practice and Future Directions. Online Learning Journal, 24(4), 198-213.

(Very impressive in some ways, especially that Chatty generated this paragraph in a few seconds; however, the citations are in APA 7 style, not MLA 9. Knowing this, I can warn students ahead of time that if they use AI to generate their papers, they still need to know MLA 9 well enough to make changes to the citations. Another thing missing is the database name, url, or doi that I require to indicate where the student found the article. AI is not able to generate that but students should be required to provide it.)

Q7–Can you use a source from NCLive to support the previous paragraph?

A7–I apologize for the inconvenience, but as an AI language model, my responses are generated based on a mixture of licensed data, data created by human trainers, and publicly available data. I have not been directly trained on specific publishers or have access to proprietary publishers like NCLive. I should note that while I strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, my responses may not always reflect the most current research or publications in the field.

I encourage you to consult NCLive or other reputable sources directly to obtain the necessary information and academic sources in MLA 9 format to support your paragraph on improving online teaching in colleges.

(I was quite encouraged by this answer. If instructors will craft their assignments in such a way as to require more local or regional resources to support more specific, personalized subjects, then students will be less likely to be successful in using AI to generate an inordinate amount of material for their compositions.)

Q8–I am a teacher trying to discover how to prevent cheating by using AI. You have given me some good information, but I don’t know how to convince students of the importance of academic integrity when society seems to care mainly about the final grade a student receives in any given course. Any suggestions on how I can convince students of the importance of academic integrity?

Photo by RDNE Stock project on Pexels.com

A8–(truncated) Convincing students of the importance of academic integrity requires a multifaceted approach that combines education, engagement, and fostering a culture of integrity. Here are some suggestions to help convey the significance of academic integrity to your students:

1. Start with the Why: Begin the conversation by explaining the underlying principles and values that academic integrity upholds. Emphasize that it goes beyond just obtaining a grade and is essential for personal growth, ethical development, and long-term success in academia and beyond. (In an 8-week online course, I try to do this through frequent recorded sessions. Students are required to attend live or view the recording)

2. Create Meaningful Connections: Connect academic integrity to real-world examples and situations that students can relate to. Discuss the impact of dishonesty and plagiarism on professional reputation, the trustworthiness of research, and the consequences in various fields and industries. (Hard to do in an accelerated online course)

5. Explain the Learning Process: Help students understand that the primary purpose of assignments and assessments is to promote learning, critical thinking, and skill development. Emphasize that by engaging in academic dishonesty, they are robbing themselves of the opportunity to grow and succeed based on their own abilities. (I also use the recorded sessions to explain the learning process.)

6. Teach Research Skills and Citation: Offer guidance on proper research methods, citation practices, and the use of academic sources. Demonstrate how correct citation and referencing strengthen their arguments, demonstrate credibility, and contribute to the scholarly conversation.

7. Showcase Academic Achievements: Highlight and celebrate instances of exemplary academic work, original thinking, and creativity. Recognize and reward students who demonstrate a commitment to academic integrity, reinforcing the value and importance of ethical conduct. (I wish I had more time to do this technique, but it is tough with a heavy teaching load and accelerated classes.)

10. Lead by Example: Demonstrate integrity in your own teaching practices. Clearly communicate expectations, provide fair assessments, and model ethical behavior in the classroom. Be available to answer questions and provide guidance when students face challenges.

By consistently promoting the value of academic integrity, fostering open dialogue, and providing support and guidance, you can help create a classroom environment where students recognize the significance of academic honesty and are motivated to uphold it.

***

Chatty certainly offers some excellent advice and demonstrates an impressive command of educational techniques. However, like so many other technological tools to help students and educators, Language AI is not the savior nor the threat that so many seem to take it. It is a tool to be used for good or ill, as a valuable time-saver or as a debilitating crutch. It is only as good as the human using it.

In the end, education doesn’t happen through the use of impressive technology. Even in the age of AI, teachers still reach students the same way they always have, through building relationships, one student at a time.

Hey, Mrs. Winkler!

Musings and Mutterings About Higher Education in the South

Artificial Intelligence

AI and the Changing Composition Classroom

Process over Product

Chatting with ChatGPT